PIONEERS OF LIVER TRANSPLANTATION: AN EXPANDED HISTORICAL REVIEW

From experimental canine grafts to living-donor and machine-perfusion eras, these innovators shaped modern hepatic transplantation.

FOUNDATIONAL ERA (1950s–1960s)

  • Jack Cannon — early canine orthotopic liver transplants (UCLA, 1955).
  • Francis D. Moore — metabolic physiology of transplantation; hepatic replacement in dogs (Harvard).
  • Thomas E. Starzl — first human attempt (1963) and first long-term survivor (1967); defined perioperative management.
  • Vladimir Demikhov — auxiliary graft experiments and cross-circulation models (USSR) influencing technique evolution.
Key Point: Technical feasibility came first; durable survival awaited immunologic breakthroughs.

IMMUNOSUPPRESSION & SURVIVAL ERA (1970s–1980s)

  • Roy Y. Calne — azathioprine + steroids; clinical introduction of cyclosporine (late 1970s–80s).
  • Thomas E. Starzl — integrated cyclosporine; later championed tacrolimus (FK506) protocols.
  • John Wallwork — Cambridge refinements in surgical technique and immunosuppression synergy.

By 1983, one-year survival exceeded 60%; NIH designated liver transplantation “standard of care.”

TECHNICAL INNOVATORS (1980s–1990s)

  • Henri Bismuth — reduced-size and segmental grafts; paved way for split-liver approaches.
  • Jean Belghiti — split-liver and living-donor optimization in Paris.
  • Russell W. Strong — first successful pediatric living-donor liver transplant (Brisbane, 1989).
  • Christoph E. Broelsch — left-lateral segment grafts; donor safety protocols for pediatric LDLT.
  • Andreas Tzakis — cluster/multivisceral transplantation (Pittsburgh) standardization.
Key Point: Segmental grafts and donor-safety advances unlocked transplantation for infants and expanded access.

MODERN ERA (2000s–PRESENT)

  • Masatoshi Makuuchi — anatomical segmentectomy and adult-to-adult LDLT (right lobe).
  • Shinji Uemoto — Kyoto LDLT protocols; exceptional survival benchmarks.
  • John J. Fung — tacrolimus refinement, chronic rejection surveillance, tolerance research.
  • Robert A. Fisher & Robert S. Brown Jr. — U.S. living-donor programs and MELD-based allocation impact.
  • Machine perfusion teams — hypothermic/normothermic perfusion improving marginal graft utilization.

Frontiers include tolerance induction, cell therapies, and xenotransplantation trials grounded in decades of progress.

REFERENCES

  1. Moore FD, Demissianos HV, et al. Homotransplantation of the liver in dogs. Surgery. 1959;46:403–415.
  2. Starzl TE, et al. Experimental and clinical homotransplantation of the liver. Ann Surg. 1967;166:411–439.
  3. Calne RY, et al. Cyclosporin A: clinical organ grafting series. BMJ 1978; Lancet 1979–1981.
  4. Bismuth H, Houssin D. Reduced-size orthotopic liver transplantation. Surgery. 1984;95:367–370.
  5. Strong RW, et al. Living-related donor liver transplantation (Brisbane). Lancet. 1989;2:497–500.
  6. Broelsch CE, et al. Segmental liver transplantation in children and adults. Ann Surg. 1990;212:368–377.
  7. Tzakis AG, Todo S, Starzl TE. Cluster/multivisceral transplantation. Ann Surg. 1989;210:421–432.
  8. Makuuchi M, et al. Adult-to-adult LDLT using right lobe. Ann Surg. 1996;223:35–40.
  9. Uemoto S, et al. Living-donor liver transplantation in adults. Lancet. 1998;351:679–681.
  10. Fung JJ, et al. FK506 pharmacokinetics in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1990;22:6–12.
  11. Brown RS, et al. Impact of MELD on allocation. Hepatology. 2004;39:476–483.
  12. Abecassis M, et al. Living donor liver transplantation—evolution and outcomes. Transplantation. 2012;93:975–983.
© Educational content – not medical advice. Compiled by Dr. Michael Baruch.